Pubmatic released a report covering the massive drop– Q408 average CPMs are at 26 cents. Before folks claim economic peril, let’s consider a few other factors. The mix of inventory for ad network has shifted dramatically to social, which has historically terrible CPMs. From a weighted average perspective, it’s hard to say exactly the impact, but we know that 4 of the top 10 sites out there are now social and that social traffic recently passed adult as the largest category. And the reason that social network have bad traffic is not necessarily because of a young demographic. The more pages that users consume on a site, the lower the frequency they click on ads. If heavy users are consuming 60 to 100 pages per day on a social network, as opposed to 6 to 10 pages on other sites, you cannot expect ad clicks to increase in linear proportion to pageviews.
What I’d like to see is gross earnings by site quarter over quarter. Internet advertising is such that we have a growing audience of users consuming more pages per session– thus CTR will continue to slide. And if revenue per click is constant, you can’t help but see eCPM (what publishers are earning per thousand impression) and CPMs slide. My hunch is that gross earnings per site are flat, as opposed to down 50%. Falling CPMs is both normal and good.
I’ve seen a a 40% drop at first which has now slid to a 50% drop on my eCPM across the board on a network of over 10 sites.
Its having a massive effect on me but it does look like im not the only one seeing this massive drop. I guess its all part of the credit crunch taking its bite.
waoowww.. I wonder how 2009 will be? Thanks for the great info
Display ads are still “Push” marketing which, to be honest, makes me ill…When are the advertisers of the world going to wake up? And when is Google going to solve the problem of serving up display ads exactly like text ads when users want to see them? Is it so hard?